With the performance delta so tight between the 1080 Ti and TITAN Xp, it’s little surprise that NVIDIA decided to transplant some Quadro optimizations to the higher-end option. For raw compute, the 1080 Ti is an obvious choice, especially with its large 11GB GDDR5X. That’s ignoring the fact that TITAN V includes Tensor cores as well, which as we learned last month is being used to complement NVIDIA’s AI-driven denoiser (but that’s only one of countless possibilities).įor easier-to-stomach pricing, the TITAN Xp at $1,200 offers tremendous value where more serious workloads are concerned eg: CATIA, and Siemens NX (the latter of which exhibits a 20x performance boost over GTX 1080 Ti).
Sure, that 32GB of ECC memory is nice, but given the Quadro-like performance delivered by the TITAN Xp in many cases, a TITAN V would offer a considerable performance gain over a card like the P6000. It’s hard to call a card like the TITAN V a good “bang-for-the-buck” with a $3,000 price tag, but it’s admittedly the most lucrative card of the bunch to me – even more so than the GV100. NVIDIA’s lineup is a bit larger than AMD’s, especially on the top-end, where two Volta cards sit.ġ GDDR5 2 HBM2 3 HBM2 + ECC 4 GDDR5X 5 GDDR5X + ECC I’m not entirely sure how its strengths compare to RX Vega, but given current GPU pricing, the Frontier Edition can typically be had for $900, which isn’t a massive premium over the Vega 64 at miner-fueled pricing. We don’t have one here, but I feel like the Frontier Edition would be the best overall choice in AMD’s lineup for those who want top-end performance across a range of scenarios. Prices listed as MSRP, retail price may vary. To get a move on, let’s take a look at the current product stacks from both AMD and NVIDIA:Īn italicized name means we don’t have that card for testing. There’s also something a bit special: this article introduces our first deep-learning benchmarks, which will pave the way for more comprehensive looks in the future.
#NVIDIA QUADRO K1100M DRIVER SPECS PRO#
For actual pro cards, we have the Quadro P2000, P4000, P5000, P6000, and Radeon Pro WX 3100, WX 4100, WX 5100, and WX 7100.Īs always, the tests we chose to run on these GPUs tackle many different scenarios, including rendering, encoding, crypto and other mathematics, viewport interactions, and a bit of gaming. That comes in addition to NVIDIA’s gaming-bound GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, and also the TITAN Xp (x2). In this updated look, the Vega 64 makes a return with updated numbers, and the RX 580 has joined in on the fun as well, to give us a look at non-Pro Polaris performance. The last time we tackled WS GPU performance in any depth was following the launch of AMD’s Radeon RX Vega series, where we discovered that Vega isn’t to be messed with on the compute side. One thing we haven’t posted lately is an updated performance look across the entire fleet of workstation GPUs we have available to us. We’ve been keeping busy with workstation-related content at Techgage recently, with articles involving a performance look at Chaos Group’s upcoming V-Ray 4.0 and AMD’s Radeon ProRender, as well as a recap of what we learned at NVIDIA’s GTC 2018. We’d recommend looking through our recent GPU performance content for up-to-date results, benchmarks, and graphics cards. The performance information found in this article is outdated.
0 kommentar(er)
